<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Acer Aspire One VS Asus EeePC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xarj.net/2008/acer-aspire-one-vs-asus-eeepc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xarj.net/2008/acer-aspire-one-vs-asus-eeepc/</link>
	<description>My Music, Videos, Photos and More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 07:09:15 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.xarj.net/2008/acer-aspire-one-vs-asus-eeepc/comment-page-1/#comment-31785</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 15:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xarj.net/?p=1326#comment-31785</guid>
		<description>I agree the Acer is much nicer and professional looking, but it&#039;s misleading to say that the EeePC has no hard drive. You mean it has no &quot;mechanical&quot; hard drive. 

Instead it has a &quot;solid state drive&quot;. You get no where near the storage capacity of a conventional hard drive and are more expensive which are the biggest disadvantage, but then you don&#039;t get any of the faults from mechanical drives either. Since SSD&#039;s have no moving parts, it&#039;s tons more shock resilient and more durable than a mechanical device which is very important in laptops since they get handled so much. SSD&#039;s also consume less power so your batteries last longer, they have a faster read/write time than mechanical drives, and are silent whereas you can hear the clicks and spinning of a conventional drive. 

When manufacturers can come up with a much larger capacity SSD at an affordable price, SSDs will takeover the obsolete mechanical drives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree the Acer is much nicer and professional looking, but it&#8217;s misleading to say that the EeePC has no hard drive. You mean it has no &#8220;mechanical&#8221; hard drive. </p>
<p>Instead it has a &#8220;solid state drive&#8221;. You get no where near the storage capacity of a conventional hard drive and are more expensive which are the biggest disadvantage, but then you don&#8217;t get any of the faults from mechanical drives either. Since SSD&#8217;s have no moving parts, it&#8217;s tons more shock resilient and more durable than a mechanical device which is very important in laptops since they get handled so much. SSD&#8217;s also consume less power so your batteries last longer, they have a faster read/write time than mechanical drives, and are silent whereas you can hear the clicks and spinning of a conventional drive. </p>
<p>When manufacturers can come up with a much larger capacity SSD at an affordable price, SSDs will takeover the obsolete mechanical drives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.xarj.net/2008/acer-aspire-one-vs-asus-eeepc/comment-page-1/#comment-31433</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 23:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xarj.net/?p=1326#comment-31433</guid>
		<description>I agree with you 100%...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you 100%&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
